Almost all of those old loads haven’t changed a lot of, and I never loaded the Max loads, other than probably for my .340 Weatberby. You utilize to work up and discover a degree you were comfy with, and was Secure within your firearm.
With in close proximity to max hundreds I usually back again it off when transforming to a completely new lot of powder. Years back there was converse on line of massive variation in RE19. My .338 Winchester at enough time chrono graphed masses at below max cost higher in velocity than what the ebook experienced for max hundreds.
The vast majority of my load details emanates from older sources as well as that data is a tad conservative. No person wishes to be risky or reckless but there will come a degree When you've got to consider the information and say, "this was satisfactory 30 decades in the past, what improved?"
The masses these days look sort of watered down that is fine, but All those 231 masses for 9mm are a complete grain above todays Max, and my suspicion is usually that the real difference is in the powder?!
Back to old website Shut If there is anything at all in the cart, it won't be brought more than to the outdated web page.
I examine plenty of put up from loaders who use and like tightgroup but as I'm going thru the listing of powders there are many that do a similar task.
Michael, it's superior that you will be noticing signs of pressure and asking why. That correct there improves your probability in developing Harmless handloads IMHO. In any case not long ago revealed facts is usually far more conservative and that is a superb point.
I identified as that ok, gave the look of the prudent issue to try and do. Was my chronograph Completely wrong? Change in chamber spec, reserve details significant close, mine within the small end? No strategy for figuring out. I'd no abnormal stress indications apart from the higher than envisioned velocity.
Hodgdon now distributes Winchester makes and hp-38 powder it was just less difficult for them to fill both equally cans from exactly the same barrel.
If I'm reading your submit ideal, you say hp38 is comparable to bullseye??? that remaining claimed, The key reason why why its notthat common would be (to me) a heightened or sharp recoil impulse instead of other powders available, to the forty I'm working with WST which is softer feeling recoilwise by a mile, for the 9mm insignificant I am applying VV 3n37 and w/ the 147 grain its additional of the thrust than sharp recoil
You may evaluate the volume of the home created dipper by hp-38 powder using a syringe. This might or might not assistance your top.
It’s an incredibly smooth and reasonably precise load. I did must set within a lessened electricity recoil spring (thirteen#) to acquire it to cycle. Operates like a champ now while.
I do not think your difficulty is relevant to using HP38/231 but rather the hardness in the commercially developed bullets.
We in some cases error powder residue for primary, but, whether it is main, and It is isolated in cylinder throats and within the forcing cone, this us simply corrected. Do all cylinder throats glance the same and how accurate were these rounds?